Compare suppliers beyond the headline price.
Balance landed cost, quality, lead time and reliability before committing demand.
Protects revenueThe everyday problem
Supplier offers use different currencies, units, terms and quality evidence, making the cheapest line difficult to trust.
Supplier offer comparison.xlsxHuman decision
Sourcing, quality and finance owners approve supplier awards and payment exposure.
- 01
Input
Four supplier offers with product specification, currency, MOQ, lead time, inspection and payment terms.
- 02
Give instruction
Normalise comparable terms and show the trade-offs. Do not approve a supplier or invent missing quality results.
- 03
Agent works
Approved supplier, quality, payment and shipment records.
- 04
Human decision
Sourcing, quality and finance owners approve supplier awards and payment exposure.
Expected impact
Balance landed cost, quality, lead time and reliability before committing demand.
What to measure
Contribution protected; supplier failures; expedite cost; sourcing cycle time.
The Supply Chain Director needs cost savings that do not create delivery or quality losses later.
SME
One accountable owner reviews the evidence and proposed action before the business commits.
Enterprise
Confirm source permissions, regional owners, approval limits and system actions during scoping.
Input
Four supplier offers with product specification, currency, MOQ, lead time, inspection and payment terms.
Approved supplier, quality, payment and shipment records.
ResourcesOS + AskJary+ReadyAskJary+One offer has no verified inspection history. Should I keep its quality score unknown?
AskJary+OutputWaiting for draft
AskJary+Draft readySupplier decision brief
Landed-cost and service trade-offs shown; one supplier remains unscored for quality.
No external actions have been taken.
ResourcesOS + AskJary+Illustrative workflows. Tool availability, access and configuration require validation.